FREE PLEVIN PPI CHECK

plevin-ppi-claim

What Is Plevin & PPI High Commission?

The Plevin rule came into effect on 29 August 2017 and is the result of a case brought by Susan Plevin and decided in the Supreme Court. The purpose of the rule is to ensure that insurance companies are not charging customers high levels of commission when they bought PPI.

The commission was the reward insurance companies gave to banks and lenders as a result of selling PPI to their customers. This meant that if you have PPI, the commission payment comes from what you paid for the PPI policy.

This explains what the commission itself is, but what about high levels of commission? This is taken to mean that if more than half of the amount you've paid for the PPI policy is made up of commission, it is high level of commission.

Get back the money you’re owed by starting your free Plevin PPI check with our partner, Bee Legal.

Plevin Vs Paragon Court Ruling

Background: The case of Susan Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance 2014 was about a retired college lecturer, Plevin that had been introduced to Paragon by a broker for a loan. The broker had performed a 'demands and needs' assessment for the PPI policy. The business was accepted by Paragon. They carried out money laundering checks but not PPI suitability checks.

The loan was for £34,000 with 7.3% interest to run for 10 years and was regulated by Consumer Credit Act 1974. The single premium PPI policy cost £5780, 71.8% of which was commission.

Action: Plevin claimed as the PPI didn't meet her needs, the PPI was mis-sold to her. She also argued that had she known at the outset how much of the PPI premium was made up of commission she would never have bought it, as it wasn't value for money.

The case reached the Supreme Court in June 2014. The case now looked at the 'unfair relationship' created between her and Paragon under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, because the high commission within the PPI premium hadn't been disclosed.

Outcome: The Supreme Court ruled in Plevin's favour and agreed that she had been mis-sold PPI. They further decided that an unfair relationship existed between Plevin and Paragon because of the undisclosed commission.

The FCA and Plevin

The Plevin ruling has had huge implications for consumers and lenders alike. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) had to act and produce some guidance on how PPI matters were to be dealt with and how PPI complaints should be handled.

The FCA determined that if anyone had PPI attached to any active finance from a bank or lender since 2008, they may be owed some money.

Before Plevin, the only way to reclaim PPI was if you had been mis-sold it. However, after Plevin, the FCA set out some guidelines to define what high commission was in this case: if 50% of the cost of your PPI was paid as commission to the lender, and this wasn't made clear to you at the time, you can claim back the extra above the 50%. The reason is because this creates an unfair relationship between the lender and the customer under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 section 140A. The guidelines further outlined how banks should investigate and correct PPI commission.

Are You Eligible For A PPI Commission Claim?

If any of the situations below apply to you, there may be grounds to make a claim:

  • Your credit agreement was covered by section 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974;
  • You weren’t told about the commission that was being charged on your policy;
  • The commission paid was more than 50% of your premium with the average commission being charged at 60-70% of premium being paid by most banks and lenders.

What is the Double Recovery rule?

The Double Recovery rule came into effect on 29 August 2017 and is when a customer has already claimed successfully for mis-sold PPI, they cannot later claim again for unfair relationship. This also applies if customers didn't receive full redress.

Latest PPI Commission Claim Ruling

Potter vs Canada Square

New ruling in April 2021 means millions more customers can now make new PPI claims!

The case of Canada Square Operations Limited v Beverley Potter [2020] brought a degree of clarity to the issue of limitation points in Plevin Litigation. This judgement has been welcomed by law firms, claims management companies and claimants alike as it strengthened the claimants’ argument that these claims should not have a limitation period applied to them due to the deliberate concealment of PPI commission levels. This meant that the claims are no longer confined to a six-year limitation period.

Potter V Canada Square Ruling - April 2021

How we can help with your 'Plevin' PPI Commission claim

With our legal partner Bee Legal a Plevin PPI Claims specialist, our core focus is on helping consumers who were sold PPI to use all available and possible options to obtain a legal remedy for compensation of undisclosed & high commission from the finance provider.

Don't worry if you’re unsure whether you are eligible to make a claim under the Plevin ruling with a bank or other lender, Bee Legal will conduct a full review of all your PPI credit agreement(s) to establish whether there is case for an unfair relationship.

They will use their extensive experience with 'Plevin' based PPI claims to investigate, negotiate and settle any claim as quickly as possible. Throughout the Claim process, you will kept informed with clear and free advice on all of your available options. The Plevin PPI Check and claim service is simple and completed on a no win no fee basis*.

Plevin PPI Claim Process

 

Step 1

Start your Plevin PPI Check by requesting a call back

Bee Legal will call you back to discuss your potential claim, confirm some details, explaining the next steps & progress your claim.

Step 2

Sign & Return our pre-filled forms

Bee Legal will send you the a Letter(s) of Authority pack to sign & return back to them in order to start the Plevin check & claim process.

Step 3

Sit back & Let us check if you have a valid claim

Bee Legal will contact your lender(s) & ascertain if they charged high commission on PPI policy premiums & process your claim accordingly.

Get back the money you’re owed by starting your free Plevin PPI check with our partner, Bee Legal.

Start FREE Plevin PPI Claim Eligibility Check
Your lender may have charged unfair commission on your PPI policy, incorrectly rejected your PPI claim previously, or miscalculated your redress payment and you may be due a refund. To find out if you are eligible to reclaim under the Plevin ruling, complete your contact details below & we'll be in touch to start your no obligation Plevin PPI check.

Secure Form & Connection .
Powered by
Start FREE Plevin PPI Claim Eligibility Check
Your lender may have charged unfair commission on your PPI policy, incorrectly rejected your PPI claim previously, or miscalculated your redress payment and you may be due a refund. To find out if you are eligible to reclaim under the Plevin ruling, complete your contact details below & we'll be in touch to start your no obligation Plevin PPI check.

Secure Form & Connection .
Powered by
POTTER V CANADA SQUARE
Potter has the potential to impact on all types of credit claims!

A new PPI court ruling in April 2021 revealed how the banks used YOUR MONEY to earn hefty commissions for themselves.

Strangely, they forgot to mention the secret commissions they kept when the original PPI rulings came out.

Now the courts have said that any commission they have earned by selling PPI policies is potentially YOURS.

This ruling saw the complainant awarded £7,953.53 in compensation for the commission alone. This includes fees and interest that accrued over the years.

And it’s estimated that other people who had PPI policies will be owed from £1,000 up to £40,000 in compensation.

We can find out if you’re owed money! Just fill out our ‘Start a FREE Plevin PPI Check’ form and we will call you back.

Potter v Canada Square Case

In Potter v Canada Square, the Lender [Canada Square Operations Ltd, formerly Egg Banking plc] accepted that the non-disclosure of commission caused unfairness in the relationship; however, it defended the claim on the basis that it was issued outside the widely accepted six-year limitation period.

Mrs Potter’s legal team invoked Section 32 of the Limitation Act 1980, which extends the limitation period due to the deliberate concealment of commission levels by the lender.

Canada Square Operations Limited v Beverley Potter judgement [2020] EWHC 672 (QB)

What the press said?

Millions more customers can now make new PPI claims – could you get up to £40,000?

No, thank you. I do not want want to see the details of the judgement.
100% secure your website.
Powered by